Zapier vs Make: which fits your business in 2026?
The two automation giants - widest app coverage against the most power per dollar.
We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. Our verdicts are based on the data shown.
At a glance
| Zapier | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 4.2/5 | 4.22/5 |
| Starting price | $20/mo | $9/mo |
| Pricing basis | per month, 750 tasks, billed annually | per month, 10,000 operations, billed annually |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Trial | 14 days | 0 days |
| Integrations | 8000+ | 2000+ |
| Best for | Non-technical users who need the widest app coverage for automations | Power users who want complex, branching automations at a fraction of Zapier's cost |
| Try Zapier → | Try Make → |
Winner by use case
- Tightest budget: Make — entry plan is $11/mo cheaper ($132/year at entry tier).
- Fastest to learn: Zapier (4.5/5 ease of use).
- Most capability: Zapier (4.6/5 feature depth).
- Best value overall: Make (4.8/5 value score).
Feature matrix
| Zapier | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trial days | 14 | 0 |
| AI features | 4 | 3 |
| Integrations | 8000+ | 2000+ |
| Ease of use | 4.5/5 | 3.7/5 |
| Feature depth | 4.6/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Value for money | 3.7/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Support | 4.0/5 | 3.8/5 |
Pricing, side by side
Zapier
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | Free / custom |
| Professional | $20/mo |
| Team | $69/mo |
Verified 2026-06-12
Make
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | Free / custom |
| Core | $9/mo |
| Pro | $16/mo |
Verified 2026-06-12
Strengths and weaknesses
Zapier
- If an app exists, Zapier probably connects it
- Easiest mental model: trigger then actions
- AI builder turns plain text into working Zaps
- Huge documentation and community
- Task-based pricing gets expensive at volume
- Complex logic clunky vs Make's visual canvas
- Multi-step Zaps need paid plan
- Polling delays on lower tiers
Make
- Roughly 5-10x cheaper than Zapier per operation
- Visual canvas shows entire flow at a glance
- Real programming primitives (loops, arrays)
- Generous free plan for testing
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Fewer app integrations (2,000 vs 8,000)
- Operations counting takes getting used to
- Support response can be slow on lower tiers
Our verdict
The honest framing: Zapier is the automatic transmission, Make is the manual gearbox. Both get you there; one gives you more control and better fuel economy, the other is easier to drive.
Zapier's 8,000+ integrations mean the obscure app your accountant uses probably connects. Its trigger-action model is understood in minutes, and the AI builder now turns plain English into working Zaps. The cost: task-based pricing that gets painful at volume — heavy users routinely pay 5-10x what the equivalent workflow costs on Make.
Make's visual canvas handles what Zapier finds awkward: loops, arrays, routers, error handling with rollback. A workflow that needs three separate Zaps often fits in one Make scenario. The cost: a learning curve that filters out non-technical users, and a smaller (though still large, 2,000+) app catalog.
Choose Zapier if the people building automations are non-technical, or your apps are niche. Choose Make if you (or anyone on the team) can think in flowcharts — the price difference compounds every month.
FAQ
Is Make cheaper than Zapier?
Yes. Make starts at $9/mo versus $20/mo for Zapier (per month, 10,000 operations, billed annually). Over a year that is a $132 difference at entry tier.
Which is easier to use, Zapier or Make?
Based on our scoring, Zapier is easier to get started with (ease-of-use 4.5/5 vs 3.7/5).
Which has more features, Zapier or Make?
Zapier scores higher on feature depth (4.6/5). Key differentiators: 8,000+ app integrations - largest catalog; Multi-step workflows with branching; Webhooks and code steps.
Full reviews: Zapier review · Make review